_______________________________________________________________ | | Was 9/11 A Conspiracy? -- Summary | http://uscrisis.lege.net/911/#911summary | http://uscrisis.lege.net/911/911summary.txt | | Source: | http://forums.indigital.co.uk/id-argument/messages/?msg=21417 | http://forums.indigital.co.uk/n/mb/display.asp?webtag=id-argument&msg=21417.1 | | | USA (Reply-Only Folder) - Was 9/11 A Conspiracy? | | From: KABIRCH [ | http://forums.indigital.co.uk/dir-app/bbcard/profile.asp?webtag=id-argument&uid=317581187 | ] 8-Oct 12:14 | To: ALL 1 of 754 | | 1. Analysis of September 11 and its aftermath have not only | led to many unanswered questions, but also provided many | convincing evidences of a deep conspiracy. Was it really a | terrorist attack, or was it a conspiracy to advance the | agenda of the so-called neo-conservatives? Know the facts to | understand the truth. The truth is out there. | | The entire event of September 11 in New York was `camera | ready' to be telecasted live throughout the world. And it | had the intended effects on the world opinion. Within hours | of the attack, the U.S. administration pointed their finger | to Muslim extremists. The plot to create a worldwide | negative perception about Islam was thus successfully | executed. Phase I of the blue print was thus completed. | | Phase II started with a radical change in U.S. defense and | foreign policies of which ``pre-emptive strike'' became the | single most important agenda. Obviously, if you are | interested in starting a fight but if no one is interested, | what you do? Hit someone and you got a fight. So to start | with, Afghanistan and Iraq became the first victims of the | superpower's ``fighting bull'' mood. | | 2. `Perishable' Black Boxes and 'Magic Passport' Theory: It | is an established procedure after an aircraft | accident/disaster to recover the black boxes and analyse the | data contained therein to find out any clues. The U.S. | authorities have maintained a virtual secrecy on this issue. | The FBI Director Robert Mueller said that Flight 77's (that | is reported to crash in Pentagon) data recorder provided | altitude, speed, headings and other information, but the | voice recorder contained ``nothing useful''. And nothing | much is known about the two planes' (that crashed into the | twin towers) black boxes. So it appears that the black | boxes, which are built to be indestructible, simply | perished. On the other hand, the U.S. authorities ``found | Ata's passport undamaged''. Ata must have opened the | aircraft window to throw out his passport before colliding | into one of the WTC towers. Otherwise, how can his passport | survive the inferno that is ``believed'' to lead to the | collapse of the WTC towers? | | So far we have heard about the 'Magic Bullet' theory in | relation to JFK's assasination. Now another magic has been | added to the world of magic. It is the 'Magic Passport' | theory. Anyone with a bit of commonsense should understand | what big lies we have been asked to believe. | | 3. A Badly Written Crime Thriller Was Released for Public | Consumption: If you are writing crime thrillers, you need to | think about the trail of evidences that the perpetrators of | a crime will leave behind which will ultimately lead to | their identification. So Ata not only had to throw his | passport through the aircraft window, but also had to | ``mistakenly leave behind'' a bag at the airport containing | a `chilling suicide note' and a flight instruction manual in | Arabic! Could not Ata read English flight instruction | manual? How long had he lived in the U.S? | | Remember that the passport was reported ``to be found'' in | the rubble, not in Ata's bag which he had ``mistakenly left | behind''. Also notice that Ata carried a passport on a | domestic flight. If he knew that it was his last flight, why | would he at all bother to carry his passport when it was a | domestic flight? Did Ata think that he might need the | passport to ``enter heaven after his martyrdom''? Think | about how laughable the U.S. authorities' claims are. The | only purpose of this very badly written crime thriller is to | place the blame on the Arabs in particular and the Muslims | in general as a prelude to start the imperialistic war. | | 4. A New `Emperor Nero' Was Born: It is alleged that when | Rome was burning in flames, Emperor Nero watched it while | merrily playing his violin. Whether George Bush can play a | violin is not known, but he can read stories aloud for | children to listen. When the WTC was burning, George Bush | was reported to be reading a story about a pet goat in a | children's classroom. He did not show any visible sign of | reaction when he was informed about the first attack on the | WTC but continued reading. Was he trying to be a new | `Emperor Nero' or just waiting for the ``mission to be | accomplished''? | | 5. Dead Men Walking: None of the 19 alleged hijackers' names | were on the lists of passengers (or on the lists of crews or | pilots) of those 4 fatal flights. See the lists at: | | http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/main.html | http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm | http://www.911review.org/Sept11Wiki/PassengerList.shtml | | So how did those 19 alleged hijackers boarded into the | planes? Obviously, they must have checked-in as `hijackers'. | What more do you need for a badly written crime thriller? | But there are more. | | FBI said that a list of these 19 names was found inside a | car parked at the airport. What a classic thriller!!! It is | not known whether FBI found a sticker on the car's window | that stated ``hijackers used this car for travelling to the | airport''. | | Ten days after September 11, BBC reported that many of those | 19 alleged hijackers had nothing to do with any of those | incidents and were alive and well. | | ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm ). BBC | reported that Abdelaziz al-Omari, named as the pilot who | crashed the jet into WTC's North Tower, was reported by | Saudi authorities to be working as an electrical engineer. | He reported his passport had been stolen in Denver in 1995. | Saudi officials said it was possible that another three | people whose names appear on the FBI list also are alive. | | Only after the BBC report, the U.S. authorities conceded | that there was some doubt about the identification of some | of the hijackers, but showed no interest in identifying the | real hijackers. The BBC report and other similar reports | did not gain any prominence in the media of the western | world because it did not serve their agenda. Still today, | those 19 photographs are referred to as those of the | hijackers. | | See more at: | http://thunderbay.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/2373.php | | 6. What Hit Pentagon, Aircraft or Missile?: Photographs of | Pentagon crash site did not show any debris from the | aircraft nor did the pattern of the damage indicate that it | was the result of an aircraft crash. If you carefully see | those pictures, you will notice that the aircraft wings | caused no damage to the buildings. The damage looks like | being caused by a wingless aircraft, i.e. a missile, or | something else. | | See the photographs at: | http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm | | 7. Flying and Demolition Jobs Made Easy? Do you remember | those aircrafts taking sharp turns (as was seen on | world-wide telecast) before colliding into the twin towers | with so devastating accuracy? But the alleged hijackers were | said to have a few months of training with flight simulators | and small training planes. So is not this tantamount to | suggesting that handling large aircrafts are relatively | easy? Another ``lesson'' from the U.S. authorities' version | of events is that controlled demolition of large structures | does not need use of explosives, a few barrels of jet fuel | can do it. Does it sound very funny? Then think about the | U.S. authorities' version of September 11 events. | | 8. How Did the Towers Actually Collapse?: The U.S. | authorities' version about the twin tower collapse is a | total rubbish. Scientific explanations and evidences prove | that the twin towers were brought down by controlled | demolition. Following are very briefly some of the reasons | to prove that: | | * (i) Were the Laws of Physics Suspended on that Day?: | When the twin towers collapsed, they collapsed at an | astonishing speed, neatly and symmetrically. Using formula | from Physics, it has been shown that it would take about 10 | seconds for the upper part of the twin towers to reach the | ground IF AND ONLY IF there was nothing in between the upper | part of the building and the ground. That was exactly the | time that the collapse of the towers actually took. Then | what happened to the floors below it? In other words, the | floors below provided no resistance at all to prevent the | `free fall' of the upper part. It means that the lower part | of the towers were so damaged that they provided no | resistance to the `free fall' of the upper part. This | happens only in the case of a controlled demolition. On the | other hand, if the towers had collapsed only because of a | weakened steel frame and by its own weight, then it would | have taken at least one second for each floor (and those | above it) to collapse onto the one below it. Assuming that | the collapse started from the 80th floor, it would have | taken at least 80 seconds for the collapse to be complete. | | The U.S. government's version of the twin tower collapse | thus suggests a fundamental inconsistency with the law of | physics. None of the laws of Physics was suspended on 11 | September 2001. What was suspended was people's common sense | by the shock of the events. And conspirators used that shock | therapy for people to swallow their badly written ``crime | thriller''. For more detailed scientific analysis, visit: | http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/law_of_free_fall.htm | | An analysis of the twin towers' collapse from a structural | engineering perspective can be found at: | http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/03/35245_comment.php | | * (ii) Jet Fuel Cannot Melt Steel: The melting point | of construction steel is 1500 degrees Celsius. Jet fuel | burning in open air can reach just over half of that | temperature. Inside a high-rise office block (which are | usually an enclosed space), the fire is likely to have died | down rather quickly because of lack of enough oxygen. The | thick black smoke was an indication of that. That 300,000 | tons of steel structure was melted by two planeloads of jet | fuel is an absolute rubbish. | | The temperature was so high that part of the WTC's steel | structure evaporated and part of it took the shape of | ``Swiss cheese''. It is impossible for fire from jet fuel to | cause all these. According to one report, ``there is no | indication that any of the fires in the World Trade Centre | buildings were hot enough to melt the steel framework. | Jonathan Barnett, professor of fire protection engineering, | has repeatedly reminded the public that steel - which has a | melting point of 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit - may weaken and | bend, but does not melt during an ordinary office fire. Yet | . . . . a one-inch column has been reduced to half-inch | thickness. Its edges - which are curled like a paper scroll | - have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes | - some larger than a silver dollar - let light shine through | a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance | shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see | distortion and bending - but not holes'' ( `The ``Deep | Mystrey'' of Melted Steel' | www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations/2002Spring/Steel.htm). See | more analysis at: | http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/fires/steel.html | | * (iii) Concrete Turned into Dust Cloud: There are | speculations about the use of a new secret weapon that | disintegrates matters fast. Much of the concrete of the twin | towers turned into fine dust causing a huge dust cloud, a | process that would have required enormous amount of energy. | Where did this energy come from? | | * (iv) Seismic Evidence of Underground Explosions: The | Columbia University's observatory in Palisades, New York, 34 | km north of WTC recorded seismographic evidence of huge | underground explosions well before the debris from the | crumbling towers reached the ground ( | http://intellex.com/~rigs/page1/wtc/seismic.htm or | http://uscrisis.lege.net/911/#911seismic ). The huge spike | in the seismic chart is an indication that the foundation of | the towers were destroyed by explosives. Firefighters' also | reported explosions inside the towers. Close analysis of | twin tower photographs clearly showed horizontal layers of | explosive charges detonating. See extensive photographs with | analysis at the following site which proves the authenticity | of the `deliberate demolition' theory ( | http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/07/56715_comment.php | ). It is only because of the destruction of the base of the | towers and use of controlled explosions on different floors | that the towers collapsed so fast, symmetrically and neatly. | | * (v) Hijacking `in Abstentia': An amateur video of | the second plane hitting the south tower, shown on Danish | TV2's 22 Fokus on 19 September showed a laser-beam like spot | moving across the west façade of the tower immediately | before the plane crashed into it. The spot, which some | experts believe, is evidence of a laser guidance system for | the plane. There are speculations that the planes which | collided into the twin towers were overtaken by remote | control mechanism. Some people suggested that the mysterious | destruction of the Egypt Air plane in late 2000 as the first | trial of `hijacking by remote control'. | | * (vi) Photograph of Unexplained Objects: There are | photographic images that an incredibly fast-streaking | unexplained object headed towards the twin towers at the | precise moment the plane exploded in the south tower ( | http://www.denverspiritualcommunity.org/AmericanFreePress/AFPNewsJul02.htm#anchor1671271 | ). | | * (vii) Other Unexplained Things: The presence of | extreme hot spots and an unexplained crater at ground zero | was another cause of suspicion. | | * (viii) Built to Survive: The twin towers were | designed to survive a collision with a Boeing 707. Those | colliding into the twin towers were slightly larger, but it | explains nothing about the towers' collapse. | | * (ix) Mysterious Collapse of a 3rd Building: In the | afternoon of 11 September, a third building (7-WTC) also | collapsed in the same pattern as the twin towers. Not only | that, sections of its steel beam evaporated, the New York | Times reported on Nov 29, 2001. It was not hit by any | aircraft but only by small amount of debris from the twin | towers. What caused its collapse and what caused sections of | its steel beam to evaporate? No satisfactory answer has been | provided. | | * (x) Re-create to Understand: It won't be difficult | to undertake an experimental re-creation of the collapse of | the twin towers on a miniaturized scale in order to | understand their collapse. However the U.S. government | won't ever do it. | | * (xi) For Further Info: Check the Internet to find | out more about how the twin towers collapsed. Two such sites | are: | | http://www.911-strike.com/demolition_explosive.htm | http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html | | 9. Any Investigations? What investigations have been | conducted to an event that caused the death of so many | innocent lives and changed the world? The Bush | administration not only showed lack of interest in | investigations but actually resisted any effort for a broad | enquiry. Whatever investigations were carried out, their | objectives were preset. Not only that, evidences of this | crime were quickly destroyed. All the remains of the steel | structure, which contained vital forensic evidences, were | exported overseas as quickly as possible. And no | investigation is known to have been carried out about the | mysterious transactions in the stock market that took place | days before September 11. Anyone who destroys evidence of | crime and obstructs investigation should be a natural | suspect. | | 10. Motives, Beneficiaries and Victims: All acts of crime | have motives, beneficiaries and victims. If Bin Laden was | behind September 11, what was his motive and how has he or | his organization benefited from it? In George Bush's own | words, ``he is on the run''. So was it Bin Laden's motive | ``to get chased to be on the run''? If Bin Laden was so | clever as to plan and execute September 11 by sitting in | Afghanistan, then he would have been clever enough to | predict its consequences as well. | | Who gained from September 11? George Bush's popularity rose | to unprecedented levels. New U.S. imperialism is now | occupying the second largest oil reserve in the world and | D*i*ck Cheney's Halliburton got the Iraq oil contracts. In | the insecurity and uncertainties created by September 11, | the security related and arms industry got a major boost. | According to a recent report, the U.S. exported 45 per cent | of world's total arms export in 2002-03. How Israel is | benefited does not need any elaboration. | | The primary victims of September 11 are the Muslims. | September 11 was created to generate hatred against the | Muslims so that the new American imperialism in the | middle-east can be justified. Another victim is civil | liberties as draconian laws are being introduced in the name | of ``fighting terrorism''. In the matter of a single day, | the general environment of peace and security was shattered | and replaced by an environment of fear. | | 11. Bin Laden's Role: Bin Laden's role looked mysterious. | Since September 11, the world has from time to time heard | about the so-called ``Bin Laden tapes''. Is Bin Laden so | powerful or clever to carry out attacks by declaring them in | advance? These tapes are actually designed to help maintain | George Bush's war hysteria by maintaining an atmosphere of | fear. | | Consider the official version: "A man living in caves | planned and executed the most daring attacks on the | superpower's heart which the superpower utterly failed to | prevent. Not only that, the caveman poses a constant threat | to the superpower by issuing in advance threats of future | attacks". Is not this an absolute non-sense? | | Bin Laden's name has been used by the conspirators to serve | the role of the ``bad guy'' in this ``crime thriller''. | These ``Bin Laden tapes'' are the forgery work of the | conspirators. Immediately after September 11, Bin Laden | denied any role in September 11. But in the tape that was | shown to the world after September 11, Bin Laden was shown | to have ``accepted that it was done by a group of Muslims''. | What explains these inconsistencies? Is there any reason why | Bin Laden would accept responsibility when no Muslim was | involved in it? The TRUTH is that September 11 was an | ``insider job'' carried out by the extreme rightists within | the U.S establishment and NO Muslim was involved in it. | | 12. Pearl Harbour Recreated: According to a U.S. Civil | Rights Group, ``Rumsfeld and a number of other Bush | administration officials have ties to a once-obscure policy | group called the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). | In a 2000 white paper, PNAC - which had long urged an | American invasion of Iraq - said that for the United States | to assert itself properly as the world's lone superpower, | ``some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl | Harbour'' - would be required. That new Pearl Harbour came | on 11 September 2001''. ( For more details, see ``Why Don't | We Have Answers To These 9/11 Questions?'' | http://911citizenswatch.org/print.php?sid=23 ). Washington | Post (27/1/2002) in a review of George Bush's global | strategy reported that ``Like his father, Bush tries to keep | a daily diary of his thoughts and observations. That night | (11/9/2001), he dictated: "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st | century took place today." | | Why a re-creation of Pearl Harbour was necessary? It was | necessary to justify the introduction of the `Pre-Emptive | Strike Doctrine'. Without the atrocities of September 11, | the Pre-Emptive Strike Doctrine could not be justified and | the Pre-Emptive Strike Doctrine would have sounded like | Warmongers Doctrine. September 11 was thus an integral part | of the Pre-Emptive Strike Doctrine. | | Secondly, the re-creation of Pearl Harbour was necessary to | change American people's attitude towards war. Since the | Vietnam war, Americans had a distaste for involvement in | ground warfare. However imperial occupation of others' land | requires use of ground troops. So a shock therapy was needed | to bring a change in American people's attitude towards war. | September 11 provided that shock therapy and it worked. | After September 11, polls conducted in the U.S. showed that | majority of Americans are now prepared to accept even large | number of casualties from war. | | Former British Environment Minister Michael Meacher in a | recent interview (19/9/2003) revealed that both wars against | Afghanistan and Iraq were planned before 11 September 2001 ( | http://new.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/09/19/1527251 | ). However any such war without a provocation would have | been squarely condemned by the world before 11 September | 2001. So the solution? A new Pearl Harbour. | | A further disturbing sign is that September 11 is probably | not the last re-creation of Pearl Harbour. Recently, the | U.S. authorities intentionally leaked a ``CIA assessment | that it is only a matter of time that a massive attack will | take place''. What is the purpose of leaking this kind of | ``intelligence reports''? Think about what ominous sign does | it carry. Some believe that another re-creation of Pearl | Harbour could take place before the next U.S. presidential | election. See more at: | http://voxfux.com/archives/00000076.htm | Local mirror here: http://uscrisis.lege.net/911/another/ | | 13. Who Dictates U.S. Foreign and Defense Policies? Bush or | Osama?Since September 11, the world has seen radical changes | in U.S. foreign and defense policies. The world has been | told that the reshaping of U.S. foreign and defense policies | under Bush administration was a response to September 11. | This is tantamount to suggesting that the reshaping of | Washington's foreign and defense policies is a passive | reaction to the `decisions taken in Afghanistan's cave'. One | needs to understand a simple fact that `actions' of Bin | Laden DO NOT CAUSE changes in U.S. foreign and defense | policies. | | 14. Facts versus Fiction: Sometimes facts can be stranger | than fictions and in this case it is. If this critique has | not convinced you enough, I encourage you to do your own | research. Plenty of information are available on the | Internet. Two excellent sites to start with are | http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html ; and | http://www.lightscion.com/9-11_evidence.htm . | | September 11 was an event of enormous significance which has | changed the world overnight with consequences for world | peace and order. Some of the events, such as the collapse of | the twin towers, can be scientifically verified. But it | won't be done because conspirators are interested in | covering it up. Raising public awareness is one way of | creating public pressure to demand thorough and independent | investigations. | | Edited 01/11/2003 20:48:14 ET by KABIRCH | | | (In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this | material is distributed without profit to those who have | expressed a prior interest in receiving the included | information for research and educational purposes.) |______________________________________________________________